During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
FT Professional。业内人士推荐快连下载-Letsvpn下载作为进阶阅读
Visit cj.com to register as a publisher.
Responding to questions as to why costs were allowed to spiral for so long, an NHS spokesperson said the length of time it takes public sector organisations to procure contracts "can vary", and the nature of the contract was "complex".